Taking
place in a medieval fairy-tale setting, Princess Knight is the story
of young Princess Sapphire who must pretend to be a male prince so
she can inherit the throne (as women are not eligible to do so). This
deception begins as soon as she is born, as her father the King
announces his baby is a boy instead of a girl. The reason for this is
that the next-in-line to the throne, Duke Duralumin, is an evil man
who would repress the people if he were to become king, and because
of this the King will go to any length to prevent him from taking
over. (Source: Wikipedia)
Spoiler
warning: Some spoilers for the
Princess Knight manga beyond this point.
This
weekend, I spent some time finishing Osamu Tezuka's Princess Knight
series, published in two gorgeous paperback tankoubons courtesy of
Vertical Inc., as well as sending waves of unbridled WANT towards my
pre-order for the first Rose of Versailles DVD set. Wait, how are
these two related? Because thinking about Rose of Versailles'
gender-bender ways spurred even more thoughts on its predecessor,
Princess Knight, and the ideas of gender in shojo manga.
Princess
Knight aka Ribon no Kishi is commonly held up as one of the earliest
shojo titles and one that many later titles draw inspiration from.
It's hard not to examine the series without taking into account that
its one of the most definitive works in the genre. Without Princess
Knight, we wouldn't have Rose of Versailles. We wouldn't have
Revolutionary Girl Utena. We wouldn't have Princess Prince (Tomoko
Taniguchi) or Hana Kimi or Basara (Yumi Tamura).
In
Princess Knight, we clearly have the prototype for both Utena Tenjou
and Taniguchi's Lori in our heroine, Prince(ss) Sapphire, who due to
a mishap at birth must live her outside life as a boy despite being a
girl, especially since only princes can inherit the throne. She
spends a lot of the series taking her gender issues in stride,
although she does sometimes wonder what gender she really is thanks
to having the double hearts. (I think the Doctor Who jokes kind of
write themselves at this point. Spoilers, sweetie!)
For
a series written in the early fifties, it's not completely screwy
with its idea of gender roles. In the second volume, there is a
movement in Sapphire's kingdom to destroy the 'misogynistic' rule of
male-only throne inheritance and there is a women's uprising in the
castle to protect Sapphire and bring true gender equality when it
comes to chores and work in and out of the home. Black Pearl Island
is a women-only society where they are warriors who operate
independently of any kingdom.
Having
said that, there are moments when Sapphire loses her blue boys' heart
and immediately becomes weaker and frightened - like having a woman's
heart automatically makes her inferior in strength and fortitude.
Conversely, when a normally weak-willed prince accidentally eats the
blue boys' heart, he becomes much stronger in will and voice than
ever before. The series equates maleness with unbreakable strength
and femaleness with waif-y spells of fright. Sapphire is only truly a
knight when she carries both female and male heart, which can be seen
as the ultimate in gender equality but how does it highlight the
strengths of being a woman?
The
strongest woman that isn't Sapphire in terms of will and body is
actually the witch's daughter, Hecate. She knows what she wants and
doesn't let her mother, Madame Hell. She doesn't need the girls'
heart that her mother keeps stealing for her; Hecate is extremely
comfortable in her gender. Hecate isn't evil, just raised by someone
who is; she's the Marceline the Vampire Queen of Princess Knight, if
you will. I honestly think Hecate and Sapphire could have been
eternal besties, if the plot had allowed it.
Perhaps
what Princess Knight tries to show is that gender isn't physical, it
is what is in your heart. When Sapphire temporarily loses her girl's heart and
only carries the boy's heart, she declares herself a man throughout.
There has been no physical change whatsoever - the only change has
been in her chest, where once two hearts lay.
Now, do I think Tezuka
was trying to rock the manga world with a stirring treatise on gender
roles and transgender issues? Hell no. He doesn't even do that good a
job on it. But it's entertaining and it's ahead of its time by
decades and there's nothing terribly wrong with that on its surface.
Honestly,
we could talk about gender issues in Princess Knight until we're blue
in the face. But can someone explain the introduction of Greek
deities in a series that up to that point had an established
Judeo-Christian faith base? Like, seriously, that entire Venus and
Eros story arc made no sense on that basis, especially when up to
that point the series had been so obviously Christian? For goodness'
sake, Tink the angel fights Madame Hell off with a cross. She is
physically repelled by church bells! SATAN! Come on, Tezuka, what's
going on? Are you trying to be Saint Seiya before Masami Kurumada was
born? Because it's not working.
You
can pick up both volumes of Osamu Tezuka's Princess Knight at the
Vertical Inc website (www.vertical-inc.com/books/princessknight.html)
or at your local comic book store. If you want to read more thinky thoughts on Princess Knight, it's been reviewed by Warren Peace, The Comics Journal, and Manga Xanadu among others.
No comments:
Post a Comment